Meilisearch vs Elasticsearch: Compared
Quick Verdict
Meilisearch is the better choice for most self-hosters who need search for their application. It’s dramatically simpler to set up, uses far less memory, and delivers instant typo-tolerant results out of the box. Elasticsearch is the better choice for complex analytics, log aggregation, or enterprise-scale search where you need advanced query DSL, aggregations, and horizontal scaling.
Overview
Both are search engines you can self-host, but they target different use cases and skill levels.
Meilisearch — Dual-licensed MIT (Community) and BSL 1.1 (Enterprise features). 49k+ GitHub stars. Written in Rust. Designed as a fast, typo-tolerant search engine for end-user-facing applications. Single binary, zero configuration needed to start.
Elasticsearch — Elastic License 2.0 (SSPL for some components). The most widely deployed search engine in the world. Written in Java. Powers search, logging, and analytics at every scale from startups to Fortune 500. Part of the Elastic Stack (ELK).
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Meilisearch | Elasticsearch |
|---|---|---|
| Primary use case | Application search | Search, analytics, logging |
| Typo tolerance | Built-in, automatic | Requires fuzzy query config |
| Setup time | Minutes | Hours |
| Query language | Simple filters + search | Full query DSL (JSON) |
| Relevance tuning | Ranking rules (simple) | Custom scoring (complex) |
| Faceted search | Yes (built-in) | Yes (aggregations) |
| Geo search | Yes | Yes |
| Full-text search | Yes | Yes |
| Aggregations | Basic (facets, stats) | Advanced (pipeline aggs) |
| Multi-tenancy | Via tenant tokens | Via index aliases, RBAC |
| Horizontal scaling | No (single-node CE) | Yes (sharding, replicas) |
| Real-time indexing | Near real-time | Near real-time |
| Document size limit | ~100 KB default | No practical limit |
| API style | RESTful, intuitive | RESTful, verbose JSON |
| SDK availability | Official: JS, Python, PHP, Ruby, Go, Rust, Java, Swift, Dart | Official: Java, Python, JS, Go, Ruby, PHP, Rust, .NET |
| Auth | API key based | Built-in RBAC + API keys |
| RAM usage (idle) | ~50-100 MB | ~1-2 GB (JVM heap) |
| Storage engine | LMDB (disk-based) | Lucene (disk-based) |
| Docker image | getmeili/meilisearch | docker.elastic.co/elasticsearch/elasticsearch |
| Default port | 7700 | 9200 |
| License | MIT / BSL 1.1 | Elastic License 2.0 |
Installation Complexity
Meilisearch is one of the simplest search engines to deploy:
services:
meilisearch:
image: getmeili/meilisearch:v1.35.1
container_name: meilisearch
ports:
- "7700:7700"
volumes:
- meili_data:/meili_data
environment:
- MEILI_MASTER_KEY=your-master-key-change-this-min-16-chars
- MEILI_ENV=production
restart: unless-stopped
volumes:
meili_data:
Start it, index some documents via the REST API, and search. That’s it. No schema definition required — Meilisearch infers it from your documents.
Elasticsearch requires more configuration:
services:
elasticsearch:
image: docker.elastic.co/elasticsearch/elasticsearch:8.19.11
container_name: elasticsearch
ports:
- "9200:9200"
volumes:
- es_data:/usr/share/elasticsearch/data
environment:
- discovery.type=single-node
- xpack.security.enabled=false
- ES_JAVA_OPTS=-Xms512m -Xmx512m
ulimits:
memlock:
soft: -1
hard: -1
restart: unless-stopped
volumes:
es_data:
Elasticsearch needs JVM tuning (ES_JAVA_OPTS), vm.max_map_count=262144 set on the host (or it crashes), and understanding of index mappings for optimal performance. Security is on by default in 8.x, which adds TLS certificate management to the setup.
Meilisearch wins on simplicity by a wide margin.
Performance and Resource Usage
Meilisearch is built in Rust and designed for speed with minimal resources:
- Idle RAM: ~50-100 MB
- Search latency: Sub-50ms for most queries
- Indexing: Fast for datasets under 10M documents
- Storage: LMDB — data lives on disk, not in RAM. Index size is roughly 1-2x document size.
Elasticsearch is a Java application running on the JVM:
- Idle RAM: 1-2 GB minimum (JVM heap)
- Search latency: Sub-100ms typical, highly tunable
- Indexing: Designed for massive throughput at scale
- Storage: Lucene segments on disk, with file system cache leveraging available RAM
For a typical self-hosted application (product catalog, wiki, blog search), Meilisearch uses 10-20x less RAM than Elasticsearch. For log aggregation or analytics with billions of documents, Elasticsearch scales horizontally where Meilisearch cannot.
Community and Support
Meilisearch: 49k+ stars. Active Discord community. Commercial support via Meilisearch Cloud. Well-documented REST API. Growing ecosystem of integrations (Strapi, Laravel Scout, WordPress, etc.).
Elasticsearch: The industry standard. Massive community, extensive documentation, thousands of blog posts and tutorials. Commercial support from Elastic. Integration with every major framework and platform. Elastic Stack (Kibana, Logstash, Beats) provides a complete observability platform.
Elasticsearch has the larger ecosystem by orders of magnitude. Meilisearch has a friendlier, more accessible community for developers building application search.
Use Cases
Choose Meilisearch If…
- You need search for a web application (e-commerce, docs, blog)
- You want instant, typo-tolerant search results
- You’re running on limited hardware (VPS, Raspberry Pi)
- You want zero-config relevance that works well out of the box
- You don’t need aggregations or complex analytics
- You want the simplest possible setup
- Your dataset is under 10 million documents
Choose Elasticsearch If…
- You need log aggregation and analysis (ELK stack)
- You need complex aggregations and analytics queries
- You need horizontal scaling across multiple nodes
- You’re building an observability platform (with Kibana)
- You need advanced query DSL with custom scoring
- Your dataset exceeds 100 million documents
- You need RBAC and fine-grained access control
Final Verdict
Meilisearch is the right choice for application search. If you’re adding search to a website, app, or internal tool, Meilisearch gets you from zero to excellent search in minutes. The typo tolerance, faceting, and instant results work beautifully out of the box. The resource footprint is tiny compared to Elasticsearch.
Elasticsearch is the right choice for data infrastructure. If you need log aggregation, complex analytics, or search at massive scale, Elasticsearch is battle-tested at every scale imaginable. The trade-off is significantly more complexity and resource requirements.
For most self-hosters adding search to an application: Meilisearch. For building an observability stack: Elasticsearch (or consider OpenSearch as a fully open-source alternative).
Related
Get self-hosting tips in your inbox
New guides, comparisons, and setup tutorials — delivered weekly. No spam.