Linkding vs Hoarder: Bookmark Managers

Traditional Bookmarks vs AI-Powered Hoarding

Linkding is a no-frills bookmark manager. Add a URL, tag it, search it later. It does one thing and does it well — fast, lightweight, and stays out of your way.

Hoarder takes a different approach. It’s designed for people who save everything — links, notes, images, PDFs — and uses AI (via Ollama or OpenAI) to automatically categorize and tag saved content. Think of it as a self-hosted Pinterest meets Pocket with AI organization.

The choice comes down to how you save things: methodically (Linkding) or compulsively (Hoarder).

Feature Comparison

FeatureLinkdingHoarder
Primary useBookmark managementContent hoarding (links, notes, images)
Auto-taggingNoYes (AI-powered via Ollama/OpenAI)
Content typesURLs onlyURLs, notes, images, PDFs
Full-text searchYes (page content)Yes (page content + AI descriptions)
Browser extensionYes (Chrome, Firefox)Yes (Chrome, Firefox)
Mobile appPWAiOS, Android (Flutter)
Read-it-laterBasic (archive page content)Yes (full-page snapshots)
RSS feedsYes (per-tag, global)No
APIREST APIREST API
Bulk importYes (Netscape format, Pocket)Yes (various formats)
SharingPublic bookmark listsShared lists
Resource usage~30MB RAM~150MB RAM (without AI)
DatabaseSQLiteSQLite + ChromaDB (AI)
LanguagePython (Django)TypeScript (Next.js)

Tagging and Organization

Linkding uses manual tagging. You save a bookmark, type tags, and you’re done. Tags are autocompleted from your existing tags. The search is fast and covers bookmark titles, descriptions, URLs, and (optionally) archived page content. Simple, predictable, and you’re always in control of your taxonomy.

Hoarder can auto-tag saved content using AI. Point it at an Ollama instance running a model like Llama 3, and it analyzes saved pages to suggest tags automatically. Save a link about Docker networking? Hoarder tags it docker, networking, containers without you typing anything. The AI also generates summaries of saved content, making search more effective.

The AI tagging is optional — you can use Hoarder without it, but that strips away its primary differentiator. Without AI, Hoarder is a heavier alternative to Linkding with fewer features.

Content Beyond URLs

This is Hoarder’s biggest advantage. Linkding manages bookmarks (URLs). Hoarder manages content:

  • Notes — quick text snippets saved alongside bookmarks
  • Images — screenshots, diagrams, photos saved directly
  • PDFs — documents stored and searchable

If you frequently save screenshots of UI designs, paste quick notes about code snippets, or archive PDFs alongside relevant bookmarks, Hoarder handles all of this in one interface. In Linkding, you’d need a separate tool for non-URL content.

Browser Extension

Both offer browser extensions for Chrome and Firefox.

Linkding’s extension adds a toolbar button that opens a quick-save popup. Enter tags, add a description, save. It also highlights links on the current page if you’ve already bookmarked them. Clean and fast.

Hoarder’s extension does the same quick-save but adds the ability to save highlighted text as a note and save images directly from web pages. The extension leverages Hoarder’s broader content support.

Resource Usage

MetricLinkdingHoarder (no AI)Hoarder (with Ollama)
RAM (idle)~30MB~150MB~150MB + Ollama (2-8GB)
Disk (1000 bookmarks)~50MB~200MB~200MB + model size
Containers12-3 (app + ChromaDB)3-4 (+ Ollama)
Startup time<2 seconds~5 seconds~10-30 seconds (model load)

Linkding is dramatically lighter. On a Raspberry Pi or small VPS where every megabyte counts, Linkding barely registers as a running service. Hoarder with AI tagging requires significantly more resources — an Ollama instance with even a small model consumes gigabytes of RAM.

Use Cases

Choose Linkding If…

  • You want a fast, minimal bookmark manager
  • You organize bookmarks manually with tags (and prefer to stay in control)
  • You run on limited hardware (Pi, 1GB VPS)
  • You want RSS feeds from your bookmark tags
  • You only save URLs (not notes, images, or files)
  • You value simplicity and low maintenance

Choose Hoarder If…

  • You save everything impulsively and want AI to organize it later
  • You save mixed content: links, notes, screenshots, PDFs
  • You have the resources for AI tagging (Ollama needs RAM)
  • You want automatic categorization without manual tagging effort
  • You use mobile apps regularly for saving content
  • You’re replacing a read-it-later service like Pocket or Instapaper

Final Verdict

Linkding is the better bookmark manager. If your workflow is “save a link, tag it, find it later,” Linkding is faster, lighter, and more reliable. It does exactly what a bookmark manager should do with zero bloat.

Hoarder is the better content hoarder. If you save everything — links, notes, images — and want AI to impose order on the chaos, Hoarder is genuinely useful. The AI tagging works well with a good model, and the multi-content-type support fills a gap that Linkding doesn’t address.

Most self-hosters should start with Linkding. Switch to Hoarder if you find yourself wanting AI organization or saving non-URL content frequently.

FAQ

Does Hoarder’s AI tagging work offline?

Yes, if you use Ollama (local AI inference). The AI runs on your server — no data leaves your network. Using OpenAI’s API instead sends bookmark content to OpenAI’s servers for processing.

Can I import my Linkding bookmarks into Hoarder?

Yes. Export from Linkding in Netscape HTML format (standard bookmark export), then import into Hoarder. Tags transfer. AI will re-tag imported bookmarks if enabled.

Hoarder’s search is broader (covers AI-generated descriptions and summaries in addition to page content), but Linkding’s search is faster and more predictable. For a curated bookmark collection, Linkding’s search is sufficient. For a large, disorganized hoard, Hoarder’s AI-enhanced search helps surface buried content.

Comments