Nginx Proxy Manager vs HAProxy: Which Proxy?
Quick Verdict
Nginx Proxy Manager is the better choice for most self-hosters. Its web UI makes SSL certificate management and proxy host creation point-and-click simple. HAProxy is the more powerful load balancer, but it requires manual configuration and doesn’t have automatic Let’s Encrypt integration. Unless you need advanced load balancing features, NPM saves hours of setup time.
Overview
Nginx Proxy Manager (NPM) wraps Nginx in a web-based admin interface that handles reverse proxy configuration, SSL certificate provisioning via Let’s Encrypt, and access control — all without editing config files. It’s the most popular reverse proxy for homelabs.
HAProxy is a dedicated high-performance load balancer and reverse proxy. It’s used in production by GitHub, Reddit, and Stack Overflow. Configuration is entirely file-based (haproxy.cfg) with no graphical interface.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Nginx Proxy Manager | HAProxy |
|---|---|---|
| Web UI | Full admin panel | Stats page only |
| Automatic HTTPS | Let’s Encrypt built-in | Manual cert management |
| Configuration | GUI-based | Text file (haproxy.cfg) |
| Load balancing | Basic (round-robin) | Advanced (10+ algorithms) |
| Health checks | Basic | Advanced (HTTP, TCP, custom) |
| SSL termination | Yes (GUI-managed) | Yes (manual config) |
| WebSocket support | Yes | Yes |
| HTTP/2 | Yes | Yes (frontend only in older versions) |
| TCP/UDP proxying | Limited | Full support |
| Access lists | Built-in (IP-based) | ACLs (powerful pattern matching) |
| Docker image | jc21/nginx-proxy-manager:2.13.7 | haproxy:3.3.3 |
| Default config | Working out of the box | None — must write from scratch |
| Rate limiting | Via custom Nginx config | Built-in, granular |
| Connection handling | Good | Exceptional |
Installation Complexity
NPM is straightforward:
services:
npm:
image: jc21/nginx-proxy-manager:2.13.7
ports:
- "80:80"
- "443:443"
- "81:81"
volumes:
- npm-data:/data
- npm-letsencrypt:/etc/letsencrypt
restart: unless-stopped
Start it, open port 81, log in with default credentials, and start adding proxy hosts through the GUI.
HAProxy requires writing a config file before it will start:
services:
haproxy:
image: haproxy:3.3.3
ports:
- "80:80"
- "443:443"
volumes:
- ./haproxy.cfg:/usr/local/etc/haproxy/haproxy.cfg:ro
sysctls:
- net.ipv4.ip_unprivileged_port_start=0
restart: unless-stopped
You must write a valid haproxy.cfg with global settings, defaults, frontends, and backends. There’s no default config — it won’t start without one. SSL requires manual cert provisioning and path configuration.
NPM gets you from zero to a working reverse proxy in 5 minutes. HAProxy takes significantly longer for a first-time user.
Performance and Resource Usage
HAProxy consistently outperforms NPM in benchmarks for raw proxying throughput and concurrent connection handling. It was designed specifically for this and is used by some of the highest-traffic sites on the internet.
NPM (built on Nginx) is also fast — more than sufficient for any homelab. You’d need thousands of concurrent connections before the performance difference matters.
| Metric | NPM | HAProxy |
|---|---|---|
| RAM usage | ~80-120 MB | ~30-50 MB |
| CPU overhead | Low | Very low |
| Max connections | Thousands (sufficient) | Tens of thousands |
Community and Support
NPM has 25K+ GitHub stars and a massive self-hosting community. Every homelab tutorial defaults to NPM for reverse proxy setup. Documentation is community-maintained.
HAProxy has enterprise backing from HAProxy Technologies, with comprehensive official documentation. Its community is smaller in the self-hosting space but large in the enterprise world. HAProxy Technologies offers commercial support plans.
Use Cases
Choose Nginx Proxy Manager If…
- You want a GUI for managing proxy hosts
- You need automatic Let’s Encrypt certificates
- You’re new to reverse proxies
- You have fewer than 50 proxy hosts
- You want the easiest setup possible
Choose HAProxy If…
- You need advanced load balancing (weighted, least-connections, sticky sessions)
- You’re proxying TCP/UDP services (not just HTTP)
- You need granular health checks with custom scripts
- You want sub-millisecond proxy overhead
- You’re comfortable writing configuration files
- You need rate limiting with precise control
Final Verdict
NPM for homelabs, HAProxy for infrastructure engineering. Most self-hosters never need HAProxy’s advanced features and will waste time on manual SSL management and config file syntax. NPM’s GUI handles the common case — reverse proxying a few dozen self-hosted services with automatic HTTPS — far more efficiently.
Use HAProxy if you’re running services that need sophisticated load balancing, TCP proxying, or you’re building something closer to production infrastructure than a homelab.
FAQ
Can I use HAProxy behind NPM or vice versa?
Yes. A common pattern is NPM for SSL termination and simple routing, with HAProxy behind it for advanced load balancing of specific services. This combines NPM’s easy SSL management with HAProxy’s load balancing strength.
Does HAProxy support Let’s Encrypt?
Not natively. You need an external ACME client (Certbot, acme.sh) to obtain certificates and configure HAProxy to use them. This is the biggest practical disadvantage compared to NPM.
Can NPM handle multiple backends for the same service?
NPM supports basic load balancing with custom Nginx configurations, but it’s not as straightforward as HAProxy’s backend server pools. For simple round-robin between two or three instances, NPM can do it via custom config. For anything more complex, HAProxy is better.
Is HAProxy harder to troubleshoot?
HAProxy’s config validation (haproxy -c -f /path/to/config) catches errors before reload, and its stats page provides detailed connection metrics. NPM errors are harder to debug since the config is generated by the GUI. HAProxy’s explicitness is actually an advantage for troubleshooting.
Related
Get self-hosting tips in your inbox
New guides, comparisons, and setup tutorials — delivered weekly. No spam.