Nginx vs HAProxy: Which Proxy to Self-Host?
Quick Verdict
Nginx is the better choice for self-hosting. It serves as both a web server and reverse proxy, has simpler configuration, and a larger community with more self-hosting-specific tutorials. HAProxy is a more capable load balancer with superior connection handling, but its complexity is only justified for high-traffic production environments.
Overview
Nginx is the world’s most popular web server and reverse proxy, powering roughly a third of the internet. It handles static file serving, reverse proxying, SSL termination, and basic load balancing. Current version: 1.28.2.
HAProxy is a dedicated TCP/HTTP load balancer and reverse proxy used by GitHub, Reddit, Stack Overflow, and other high-traffic sites. It’s not a web server — its focus is connection handling, health checking, and load distribution. Current version: 3.3.3 (LTS: 3.2.12).
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Nginx 1.28 | HAProxy 3.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Web server | Yes | No |
| Static file serving | Yes (fast) | No |
| Reverse proxy | Yes | Yes |
| SSL termination | Yes | Yes |
| Automatic SSL | No (needs Certbot) | No (needs Certbot) |
| Load balancing algorithms | 3 (round-robin, least-conn, IP hash) | 12+ |
| Health checks | Active (Plus only), passive (OSS) | Advanced (HTTP, TCP, agent, interval) |
| Connection queuing | No | Yes |
| Stick tables | No | Yes (session persistence) |
| Rate limiting | Yes (limit_req, limit_conn) | Yes (stick-tables) |
| Stats dashboard | No (stub_status only) | Built-in (detailed) |
| Config syntax | nginx.conf (declarative) | haproxy.cfg (procedural ACLs) |
| Hot reload | Yes (nginx -s reload) | Yes (SIGHUP) |
| HTTP/3 | Yes (1.25+) | Experimental |
| Modules | Yes (dynamic/compiled) | Lua, SPOE |
| Written in | C | C |
Installation Complexity
Nginx
services:
nginx:
image: nginx:1.28.2
ports:
- "80:80"
- "443:443"
volumes:
- ./nginx.conf:/etc/nginx/nginx.conf:ro
- ./conf.d:/etc/nginx/conf.d:ro
restart: unless-stopped
Config:
server {
listen 80;
server_name app.example.com;
location / {
proxy_pass http://app:8080;
proxy_set_header Host $host;
proxy_set_header X-Real-IP $remote_addr;
}
}
HAProxy
services:
haproxy:
image: haproxy:3.3.3
ports:
- "80:80"
- "443:443"
volumes:
- ./haproxy.cfg:/usr/local/etc/haproxy/haproxy.cfg:ro
sysctls:
- net.ipv4.ip_unprivileged_port_start=0
restart: unless-stopped
Config requires defining global, defaults, frontend, and backend sections with ACL rules for routing.
Winner: Nginx. More familiar syntax, and the same config file can serve static content and proxy traffic.
Performance and Resource Usage
| Metric | Nginx | HAProxy |
|---|---|---|
| Idle RAM | ~5-10 MB | ~15-30 MB |
| Requests/sec (proxy) | ~50,000+ | ~100,000+ |
| Max connections | ~10,000 per worker | 100,000+ |
| Connection handling | Multi-worker event loop | Single-process event loop |
| Latency overhead | ~0.3ms | ~0.1ms |
| Static file serving | Excellent | N/A |
HAProxy handles more concurrent connections and has lower proxy latency. Nginx is lighter on memory and doubles as a web server. For self-hosting loads (<100 concurrent connections), both perform identically.
Community and Support
Nginx has an enormous community with decades of documentation, tutorials, and Stack Overflow answers. HAProxy has deep enterprise documentation but less self-hosting-focused content. You’ll find more “how to proxy Nextcloud with Nginx” tutorials than HAProxy equivalents.
Use Cases
Choose Nginx If…
- You need a web server and reverse proxy in one
- You’re serving static files alongside proxying
- You want a familiar, well-documented configuration format
- You need Nginx-specific modules (njs, Lua, GeoIP2, RTMP)
- You’re following self-hosting tutorials (most use Nginx)
- You don’t need advanced load balancing
Choose HAProxy If…
- You need advanced load balancing across multiple backends
- You need sophisticated health checking with failover
- You need connection queuing and stick-table session persistence
- You’re handling thousands of concurrent connections
- You need detailed statistics and monitoring dashboards
- You’re running high-availability production infrastructure
Final Verdict
Nginx for self-hosting, HAProxy for load balancing. Neither has automatic HTTPS, so both require Certbot or similar for SSL. Nginx wins for self-hosting because it’s a web server that can proxy, while HAProxy is a load balancer that can proxy — and self-hosters need the former more often.
If you want the easiest reverse proxy experience, skip both and use Nginx Proxy Manager (GUI on top of Nginx), Caddy (automatic HTTPS, simple config), or Traefik (Docker-native auto-discovery).
Frequently Asked Questions
Do I need HAProxy for my homelab?
Almost certainly not. HAProxy’s strengths — advanced load balancing, connection queuing, stick tables — solve problems you don’t have with 10-30 Docker containers. Nginx, NPM, Caddy, or Traefik are better fits.
Which has better documentation?
Both have excellent documentation. Nginx has more community content (blog posts, tutorials, videos). HAProxy’s official docs are thorough but assume more networking knowledge.
Can Nginx do everything HAProxy does?
For basic load balancing and proxying, yes. For advanced features (12 load balancing algorithms, agent health checks, stick-table session persistence, connection queuing), no. Nginx Plus (commercial) closes some of these gaps.
Neither has automatic HTTPS — what should I use instead?
For self-hosting with automatic HTTPS: Caddy (Caddyfile + automatic HTTPS), Nginx Proxy Manager (GUI + Let’s Encrypt), or Traefik (Docker labels + ACME).
Related
Get self-hosting tips in your inbox
New guides, comparisons, and setup tutorials — delivered weekly. No spam.