OneDev vs Gitea: Which Should You Self-Host?
Quick Verdict
If you need CI/CD built into your Git platform without GitLab’s resource requirements, OneDev is the better choice — it includes visual pipelines, package registries, and automated Kanban boards at ~1-2 GB of RAM. If you only need Git hosting with pull requests and prefer minimal resource usage, Gitea at 200 MB of RAM is the lighter, more established option.
Overview
OneDev is a Java-based DevOps platform that bundles Git hosting, visual CI/CD pipelines, issue tracking with automated Kanban boards, code review, and package registries in a single container. It positions itself as a lighter alternative to GitLab CE that still includes built-in CI/CD.
Gitea is a Go-based Git forge focused on providing a fast, lightweight GitHub-like experience. It handles Git hosting, pull requests, issue tracking, and package management, but does not include CI/CD — you need a separate tool like Woodpecker CI for that.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | OneDev | Gitea |
|---|---|---|
| Git hosting | Yes (HTTP + SSH) | Yes (HTTP + SSH) |
| Pull/merge requests | Yes | Yes |
| Issue tracking | Customizable workflows, Kanban, service desk | Labels, milestones, assignees |
| Built-in CI/CD | Yes — visual editor + YAML | No (Gitea Actions for GitHub Actions compat) |
| Package registry | Docker, NPM, Maven, NuGet, PyPI, more | Docker, NPM, Maven, NuGet, PyPI, more |
| Code search | Language-aware symbol navigation | Basic text search |
| Security scanning | Built-in dependency/container scanning | No (third-party) |
| Kanban boards | Yes — automated state transitions | Yes — basic project boards |
| Time tracking | Yes | Yes |
| Wiki | No built-in wiki | No built-in wiki |
| API | REST API | REST API (GitHub-compatible) |
| SSO/LDAP | LDAP, OpenID | LDAP, OAuth2, OIDC |
| Git LFS | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Java | Go |
Installation Complexity
OneDev is a single container with an optional external database. The embedded HSQLDB works out of the box for small teams, so the simplest deployment is truly one container plus a volume. Configuration happens through environment variables or the web UI. The initial_* environment variables can skip the setup wizard for automated deployments.
Gitea is similarly simple — one container plus a database (SQLite works for small teams, PostgreSQL for production). Configuration uses an app.ini file. The Docker image is significantly smaller (~100 MB vs ~400 MB).
Both are straightforward to deploy. Gitea has a slight edge due to its smaller image and faster startup.
Performance and Resource Usage
| Resource | OneDev | Gitea |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum RAM | ~1 GB | ~170 MB |
| Recommended RAM | 2 GB | 512 MB |
| CPU | 2 cores (Java + background indexing) | 1 core |
| Docker image size | ~400 MB | ~100 MB |
| Startup time | 1-2 minutes (Java) | Seconds (Go) |
| Database | Embedded HSQLDB or PostgreSQL/MySQL | SQLite or PostgreSQL/MySQL |
OneDev uses 5-10x more RAM than Gitea. This is the fundamental trade-off: you’re paying for built-in CI/CD, symbol-level code search, and security scanning with those extra resources.
Community and Support
OneDev has a smaller but active community (~13K GitHub stars). Documentation is comprehensive. The project is maintained by a dedicated developer (Robin Shen) with consistent releases. The community is centered on the official OneDev instance at code.onedev.io.
Gitea has a much larger community (~46K GitHub stars), more third-party integrations, and broader ecosystem support. Documentation is extensive. The Gitea Actions compatibility with GitHub Actions means a vast library of existing workflows is available.
Use Cases
Choose OneDev If…
- You want built-in CI/CD without managing a separate tool
- You value the visual pipeline editor over YAML-only configuration
- You need symbol-level code search and navigation
- You want automated Kanban boards that move cards based on commit/test/deploy status
- You need built-in security scanning (dependency, container, secrets)
- You have 2+ GB of RAM available
Choose Gitea If…
- You want the lightest possible Git hosting (~170 MB RAM)
- You prefer a larger community and more third-party integrations
- CI/CD is handled externally or via GitHub Actions-compatible workflows
- You’re running on resource-constrained hardware (Raspberry Pi, small VPS)
- You want the fastest possible startup and response times
- You’re already familiar with the GitHub UI and workflow
Final Verdict
OneDev and Gitea solve different problems. Gitea is the best lightweight Git server available — fast, resource-efficient, and familiar to anyone who has used GitHub. OneDev is the best mid-weight DevOps platform — it gives you integrated CI/CD, automated project management, and code intelligence at a fraction of GitLab CE’s resource cost.
If your team needs CI/CD and you don’t want to manage a separate Woodpecker CI or Drone deployment alongside Gitea, OneDev is the simpler path. If your team primarily needs Git hosting and you’ll handle CI/CD elsewhere (or not at all), Gitea at 200 MB is 10x lighter and perfectly capable.
Related
- How to Self-Host OneDev — full setup guide
- How to Self-Host Gitea — full setup guide
- How to Self-Host GitLab CE — heavyweight alternative
- Gitea vs Forgejo — comparing the lightweight options
- GitLab CE vs Gitea — full DevOps vs lightweight
- Best Self-Hosted Git Hosting — full category roundup
Get self-hosting tips in your inbox
Get the Docker Compose configs, hardware picks, and setup shortcuts we don't put in articles. Weekly. No spam.
Comments