Pi-hole vs AdGuard Home: DNS Server Comparison
Quick Verdict
Both are excellent. AdGuard Home has a more modern feature set — built-in DNS-over-HTTPS/TLS, per-client rules, and a cleaner UI. Pi-hole has a larger community, more blocklists, and deeper customization through its ecosystem (FTLDNS, teleporter, gravity). For most new installations, AdGuard Home is the easier choice. If you want maximum community resources and extensibility, Pi-hole wins.
Overview
This comparison focuses specifically on DNS server capabilities — filtering, resolution, encryption, and network management. For ad blocking features, see Pi-hole vs AdGuard Home.
Pi-hole uses FTLDNS (a fork of dnsmasq) as its DNS engine. It handles DNS resolution, DHCP, and provides a query logging/analytics dashboard. DNS filtering is its core purpose. Pi-hole site
AdGuard Home is a DNS server with built-in filtering. It supports encrypted DNS protocols natively, per-client configuration, and runs as a single Go binary. AdGuard Home site
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Pi-hole | AdGuard Home |
|---|---|---|
| DNS resolution | dnsmasq-based (FTLDNS) | Built-in resolver |
| DNS-over-HTTPS | Via proxy (stubby/cloudflared) | Built-in native |
| DNS-over-TLS | Via proxy | Built-in native |
| DNS-over-QUIC | No | Built-in |
| DNSCrypt | Via dnscrypt-proxy | Built-in |
| DNSSEC validation | Via upstream | Built-in |
| DHCP server | Yes | Yes |
| Per-client rules | No (global only) | Yes |
| Client identification | IP-based | IP, MAC, client ID |
| Upstream DNS options | Multiple servers | Multiple + parallel queries |
| Custom DNS rewrites | Via local DNS records | Built-in rewrites UI |
| Wildcard blocking | Via regex | Via wildcards and regex |
| Safe search enforcement | No | Yes (per service) |
| Parental controls | Via blocklists | Built-in per client |
| Query log retention | Configurable | Configurable |
| API | REST (documented) | REST (documented) |
| Dashboard | Detailed statistics | Detailed statistics |
| Blocklist management | Gravity system (many lists) | List management UI |
| Default blocklist size | ~100K domains | ~50K domains |
| Docker image | pihole/pihole | adguard/adguardhome |
| License | EUPL-1.2 | GPL-3.0 |
DNS Server Specific Features
Encrypted DNS
AdGuard Home wins here. DNS-over-HTTPS, DNS-over-TLS, DNS-over-QUIC, and DNSCrypt are all built-in. Configure in the UI, provide TLS certificates, and encrypted DNS works.
Pi-hole requires a separate proxy (cloudflared or stubby) for encrypted upstream DNS. Client-side encrypted DNS (serving DoH/DoT to your network clients) requires additional setup with an external TLS terminator.
Per-Client Configuration
AdGuard Home lets you define different filtering rules per client — useful for families (strict filtering for children, relaxed for adults) or multi-tenant environments.
Pi-hole applies the same filtering globally. Per-device rules require running multiple Pi-hole instances or using group management (added in v5, but less intuitive than AdGuard Home’s approach).
DHCP
Both offer DHCP servers. Pi-hole’s DHCP (via dnsmasq) is more battle-tested and configurable. AdGuard Home’s DHCP is functional but has fewer advanced options.
Upstream DNS
AdGuard Home supports parallel queries to multiple upstream servers and fastest-response selection. Pi-hole supports multiple upstreams but queries them sequentially by default.
Performance and Resource Usage
| Metric | Pi-hole | AdGuard Home |
|---|---|---|
| RAM (idle) | ~60-100 MB | ~30-60 MB |
| RAM (large blocklists) | ~200-400 MB | ~100-200 MB |
| CPU | Very low | Very low |
| Disk | ~1 GB (with logs) | ~500 MB (with logs) |
| Query response time | ~1-5 ms | ~1-5 ms |
AdGuard Home is lighter — it’s a single Go binary versus Pi-hole’s multi-process architecture (lighttpd, PHP, FTLDNS, pihole-FTL).
Use Cases
Choose Pi-hole (as DNS server) If…
- You want the largest selection of community blocklists
- You need advanced DHCP configuration (static leases, PXE boot)
- You want maximum community support and documentation
- You prefer dnsmasq’s proven reliability for DNS
- You want to pair it with Unbound for recursive resolution
Choose AdGuard Home (as DNS server) If…
- You want encrypted DNS (DoH/DoT/DoQ) without extra services
- You need per-client DNS rules
- You want safe search enforcement and parental controls
- You want the lightest resource footprint
- You prefer a modern, single-binary deployment
Final Verdict
AdGuard Home for most new DNS server deployments. Built-in encrypted DNS, per-client rules, and lower resource usage make it the more modern choice. The UI is intuitive and configuration is simpler.
Pi-hole for maximum ecosystem and community. The largest blocklist ecosystem, extensive community documentation, and proven dnsmasq backend give Pi-hole an edge in extensibility. If you’re building a complex network with DHCP, static leases, and custom DNS records, Pi-hole’s dnsmasq foundation is hard to beat.
FAQ
Can I run Pi-hole with AdGuard Home?
There’s no reason to — they do the same thing. Pick one.
Which is better paired with Unbound?
Both work well with Unbound as an upstream recursive resolver. The Pi-hole + Unbound combination has more community guides and tutorials available.
Which handles more clients better?
Both handle thousands of clients without issues. AdGuard Home’s single-binary architecture has a slight edge under high query loads, but the difference is academic for home networks.
Can either replace my router’s DHCP?
Yes, both can serve as DHCP servers. Disable DHCP on your router and enable it in Pi-hole or AdGuard Home. Pi-hole’s DHCP (dnsmasq) is more configurable.
Related
Get self-hosting tips in your inbox
New guides, comparisons, and setup tutorials — delivered weekly. No spam.