Self-Hosted Alternatives to Asana
Why Replace Asana?
Asana’s free tier limits you to 15 users and basic features. The Starter plan costs $10.99/user/month — a team of 20 pays $2,638/year. Advanced plan ($24.99/user) adds timelines, portfolios, and goals: $5,998/year for the same team.
Asana also stores everything — project plans, task conversations, file attachments, team workloads — on their infrastructure. For teams handling sensitive projects, client deliverables, or regulated work, self-hosting eliminates that dependency.
Self-hosted alternatives offer unlimited users, no per-seat pricing, and complete data ownership. The best ones match or exceed Asana’s core features.
Best Alternatives
OpenProject — Best Overall Asana Replacement
OpenProject covers Asana’s full feature set: Gantt charts (timelines), agile boards, time tracking, cost reporting, calendar, wiki, and meeting management. It’s the most comprehensive self-hosted project management platform available.
- Docker: 1 container (all-in-one) or 3 (slim with external database)
- RAM: 4 GB minimum
- License: GPLv3
- Key advantage: Gantt charts, budgets, cost tracking, resource planning. The closest equivalent to Asana’s Advanced plan.
Read our full guide: How to Self-Host OpenProject
Taiga — Best for Agile Teams
Taiga focuses on Scrum and Kanban with sprint planning, backlogs, user stories, epics, and burndown charts. If your team uses Asana for agile workflows, Taiga’s native agile features are stronger than Asana’s board view.
- Docker: 9 containers (microservices)
- RAM: 2 GB minimum
- License: MPL 2.0
- Key advantage: Full Scrum implementation. Sprint planning, velocity tracking, burndown charts. Entirely free and open source — no paid tier.
Read our full guide: How to Self-Host Taiga
Plane — Best Modern UI
Plane has the most modern interface among self-hosted project management tools. Issues with properties, cycles (sprints), modules for grouping work, pages for documentation, and multiple view modes (board, list, spreadsheet). Closest to Asana’s look and feel.
- Docker: 7+ containers (PostgreSQL, Redis, MinIO, workers)
- RAM: ~1 GB idle
- License: AGPLv3
- Key advantage: Clean, modern UI. Issues, cycles, modules, pages. Active development.
Read our full guide: How to Self-Host Plane
Vikunja — Best Lightweight Option
Vikunja handles task and project management in a single lightweight binary. Multiple views (list, board, Gantt-style timeline, table), team namespaces, labels, priorities, due dates, reminders, and CalDAV sync. If Asana is overkill for your needs, Vikunja covers the essentials.
- Docker: Single container (with SQLite) or 2 containers (with PostgreSQL)
- RAM: ~50 MB idle
- License: AGPLv3
- Key advantage: Extremely lightweight. Runs on a Raspberry Pi. CalDAV integration syncs tasks with calendar apps.
Read our full guide: How to Self-Host Vikunja
Migration Guide
Asana supports CSV export at the project level:
- Export from Asana: Open a project → click the dropdown (⋯) → Export/Print → CSV
- What transfers: Task name, assignee, due date, section, completion status, tags, description
- What doesn’t transfer: Subtask hierarchy (flattened), file attachments, comments, custom field data (partially), task dependencies
- For OpenProject: Import via CSV with field mapping. Supports most Asana fields.
- For Plane/Taiga: API-based import. Script the CSV → API transformation. No native Asana importer.
For teams with complex Asana setups (portfolios, goals, workload views), plan for a manual migration of the organizational structure. Individual project tasks can be scripted, but cross-project relationships need manual recreation.
Cost Comparison
| Asana Free | Asana Starter | Asana Advanced | Self-Hosted | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly cost (20 users) | $0 | $220/month | $500/month | $0 (your hardware) |
| Annual cost (20 users) | $0 | $2,638/year | $5,998/year | $0 |
| 3-year cost (20 users) | $0 | $7,914 | $17,994 | $0 |
| User limit | 15 | Unlimited | Unlimited | Unlimited |
| Timeline (Gantt) | No | Limited | Yes | Yes (OpenProject) |
| Portfolios | No | No | Yes | Partial (OpenProject) |
| Goals | No | No | Yes | No |
| Custom fields | No | Yes | Yes | Yes (OpenProject, Plane) |
| Storage | 100 MB | 250 GB | 250 GB | Unlimited (your disk) |
| Privacy | Asana servers | Asana servers | Asana servers | Full control |
The savings are dramatic for teams. A 20-person team on Asana Advanced saves nearly $18,000 over three years by self-hosting — enough to buy dedicated server hardware several times over.
What You Give Up
- Asana’s Portfolios and Goals — No self-hosted tool replicates Asana’s cross-project portfolio views or goal-tracking OKR system. OpenProject has some project-level reporting but nothing comparable.
- Asana’s native integrations — Slack, Google Workspace, Microsoft Teams, Salesforce, and 200+ integrations. Self-hosted alternatives rely on APIs, webhooks, and tools like n8n for integrations.
- Asana’s mobile apps — Polished iOS and Android apps. Most alternatives offer responsive web apps; only Vikunja has dedicated mobile apps.
- Workload management — Asana’s team capacity and workload view has no direct equivalent. OpenProject’s resource planning (enterprise feature) is the closest.
- AI features — Asana Intelligence (task summaries, smart fields, status updates). No self-hosted equivalent currently.
- Zero maintenance — Self-hosting means you handle updates, backups, and uptime.
Related
Get self-hosting tips in your inbox
New guides, comparisons, and setup tutorials — delivered weekly. No spam.