Self-Hosted Alternatives to Okta

Why Replace Okta?

Cost. Okta starts at $2/user/month for basic SSO and scales to $15+/user/month for advanced features. A 50-person team pays $1,200-$9,000/year. Self-hosted identity providers are free for unlimited users.

Security control. Okta has been breached multiple times — in 2022 (Lapsus$ group accessed internal systems) and 2023 (attackers accessed customer support case data including HAR files with session tokens). When your identity provider is breached, every connected application is compromised. Self-hosting puts this critical infrastructure under your control.

No vendor dependency. Okta owns your authentication infrastructure. If they change pricing, terms, or go down (multiple major outages in 2022-2023), your entire organization loses access to everything. Self-hosted solutions have no single vendor dependency.

Compliance. Some regulations (GDPR, SOC 2, healthcare) require identity data to stay on-premises or within specific jurisdictions. Self-hosted IdPs give you full data residency control.

Best Alternatives

Keycloak — Best Enterprise Replacement

Keycloak is the closest self-hosted equivalent to Okta. Maintained by Red Hat, it offers OIDC, SAML 2.0, LDAP/AD federation, social login, MFA, fine-grained authorization, user self-service, and a comprehensive admin console. It’s widely used in enterprise environments and has years of production hardening. If you’re migrating from Okta in a professional setting, Keycloak is the answer.

Replaces these Okta features: SSO, SAML integration, LDAP/AD federation, MFA, user lifecycle management, self-service portal, social login.

Read our full guide: How to Self-Host Keycloak

Authentik — Best Modern Alternative

Authentik is a newer identity provider with a modern UI and visual flow designer. It supports OIDC, SAML, LDAP (as both consumer and provider), SCIM provisioning, social login, and MFA. It’s not as enterprise-hardened as Keycloak but offers a significantly better admin experience and faster setup. Ideal for startups, small teams, and homelabs that need Okta-like features without Okta-like complexity.

Replaces these Okta features: SSO, SAML, LDAP proxy, MFA, user management, social login, SCIM provisioning.

Read our full guide: How to Self-Host Authentik

Authelia — Best Lightweight Alternative

Authelia is a lightweight forward-auth server that adds SSO and 2FA to applications behind a reverse proxy. It doesn’t match Okta’s feature breadth — no SAML, no user management UI, no social login — but it covers the most common use case: “put a login gate with 2FA in front of all my web services.” Uses 50 MB of RAM.

Replaces these Okta features: Basic SSO (forward-auth), MFA (TOTP, WebAuthn), access policies.

Read our full guide: How to Self-Host Authelia

Migration Guide

From Okta to Keycloak

  1. Export users: Use Okta’s API to export your user directory (GET /api/v1/users). Map fields to Keycloak’s user schema.
  2. Deploy Keycloak following our setup guide
  3. Create a realm for your organization
  4. Import users: Use Keycloak’s Admin REST API or User Federation to import users. If migrating from Okta LDAP, configure LDAP federation in Keycloak.
  5. Recreate applications: For each Okta application integration:
    • OIDC apps: Create a Keycloak client with the same client_id and redirect_uris
    • SAML apps: Create a Keycloak client with the same entity ID and ACS URL
  6. Update application configs: Point each app’s SSO settings from Okta’s issuer URL to Keycloak’s realm URL
  7. Test thoroughly before switching DNS or decommissioning Okta
  8. User passwords: Users will need to reset passwords (Okta doesn’t export password hashes). Keycloak supports “update password” required actions on first login.

From Okta to Authentik

  1. Deploy Authentik following our setup guide
  2. Create providers (OIDC or SAML) for each application
  3. Import users via CSV or configure LDAP sync if you use AD
  4. Update application configs to point to Authentik
  5. Recreate any custom Okta flows using Authentik’s visual flow designer

Cost Comparison

Okta (SSO)Okta (Adaptive)KeycloakAuthentikAuthelia
Per user/month$2$6-15$0$0$0
10 users/year$240$720-1,800$0$0$0
50 users/year$1,200$3,600-9,000$0$0$0
100 users/year$2,400$7,200-18,000$0$0$0
InfrastructureManagedManaged~$10/mo VPS~$10/mo VPS~$5/mo VPS
SupportIncludedIncludedCommunity/Red HatCommunity/EnterpriseCommunity

Self-hosting breaks even immediately for any team larger than a few people. The ROI grows linearly with user count.

What You Give Up

  • Managed infrastructure. Okta handles uptime, patches, and scaling. Self-hosted means you manage everything.
  • Pre-built integrations. Okta’s integration network has 7,000+ pre-configured app integrations. Keycloak and Authentik require manual client configuration for each app.
  • Adaptive MFA. Okta’s risk-based authentication (device trust, impossible travel, anomaly detection) has no self-hosted equivalent.
  • Professional support SLA. Okta offers 99.99% uptime SLA and 24/7 support. Self-hosted support is community-based (unless you buy Red Hat support for Keycloak).
  • Compliance certifications. Okta holds SOC 2, ISO 27001, FedRAMP. Your self-hosted instance has whatever certifications you earn yourself.

FAQ

Is self-hosted identity management secure enough?

Keycloak has been used in production by banks, governments, and large enterprises. The software is audited and hardened. The risk shifts from “can I trust Okta’s infrastructure?” to “can I run and maintain my own infrastructure?” For teams with competent ops, self-hosting is equally secure and eliminates third-party breach risk.

Can I use Keycloak with all the same apps I use with Okta?

Any app that supports standard OIDC or SAML will work with Keycloak. You’ll need to manually configure each integration rather than using Okta’s pre-built catalog, but the protocols are the same.

Which self-hosted IdP is closest to Okta?

Keycloak. It has the broadest feature overlap: SAML, OIDC, LDAP federation, user lifecycle, MFA, admin console, and user self-service. Authentik is a close second with a better UI but less enterprise maturity.

Comments