Cosmos Cloud vs Dockge: Which Docker Manager?
Quick Verdict
These tools solve fundamentally different problems. Cosmos Cloud is an all-in-one self-hosting platform that bundles container management, a reverse proxy, automatic HTTPS, SSO authentication, a VPN, and DDoS protection into a single deployment. Dockge is a lightweight Docker Compose file editor with a deploy button. Choose Cosmos Cloud if you want one tool to manage everything on your server. Choose Dockge if you already have a reverse proxy and auth system and just want a clean way to manage your Compose stacks.
Overview
Cosmos Cloud (v0.20.2) is an all-in-one self-hosting platform built in Go. It combines a reverse proxy with automatic Let’s Encrypt HTTPS, container management, an app marketplace with one-click installs, multi-user authentication with SSO, a Nebula-based VPN (Constellation), SmartShield DDoS protection, and per-container firewall rules. Cosmos takes over ports 80 and 443 and becomes the gateway to everything on your server. It uses an embedded MongoDB instance for configuration storage.
Dockge (v1.5.0) is a Docker Compose stack manager created by Louis Lam, the developer behind Uptime Kuma. It is a Node.js application that does exactly one thing: manage compose.yaml files through a web UI. You create, edit, start, stop, and update stacks. The files live on disk as plain YAML. Dockge runs on port 5001, touches nothing else on your system, and uses around 30 MB of RAM.
The scope difference is enormous. Cosmos replaces your reverse proxy, auth provider, VPN server, and Docker management tool. Dockge replaces a text editor and a terminal window for running docker compose up -d.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Cosmos Cloud (v0.20.2) | Dockge (v1.5.0) |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | All-in-one platform | Compose stack manager |
| Built-in reverse proxy | Yes, with automatic HTTPS via Let’s Encrypt | No |
| App marketplace | Yes, one-click install with auto-configured proxy routes | No |
| Docker Compose editing | Yes, via UI or marketplace | Yes, interactive YAML editor (primary focus) |
| SSL/HTTPS | Automatic via Let’s Encrypt, wildcard support | Optional, manual cert configuration |
| Authentication / SSO | Built-in identity provider with 2FA, per-app permissions | Single admin account |
| VPN | Built-in (Constellation, Nebula-based mesh VPN) | No |
| Container monitoring | CPU, memory, network, disk per container | Basic status (running/stopped) |
| DDoS protection | SmartShield rate limiting and anti-bot | No |
| Multi-user | Yes, with per-app access control | No (single admin only) |
| Real-time terminal | Container logs and console | Yes, live docker compose up output |
| Compose files on disk | No, managed in internal database | Yes, standard compose.yaml in /opt/stacks/ |
| Docker run-to-Compose converter | No | Yes |
Installation Complexity
Cosmos Cloud installs as a single container but takes over ports 80 and 443:
services:
cosmos:
image: azukaar/cosmos-server:v0.20.2
container_name: cosmos-server
restart: unless-stopped
ports:
- "80:80"
- "443:443"
volumes:
- cosmos-config:/config
- /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock
environment:
TZ: "America/New_York"
volumes:
cosmos-config:
After starting, a setup wizard walks you through domain configuration, Let’s Encrypt provisioning, admin account creation, and MongoDB initialization. The setup takes a few minutes but configures everything: proxy, SSL, auth, and security in one pass.
The catch: Cosmos needs exclusive access to ports 80 and 443. If you already run Nginx Proxy Manager, Traefik, or Caddy on those ports, you must remove it first. Cosmos replaces your reverse proxy entirely.
Dockge installs on port 5001 and stays out of the way:
services:
dockge:
image: louislam/dockge:1.5.0
container_name: dockge
restart: unless-stopped
ports:
- "5001:5001"
volumes:
- /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock
- ./data:/app/data
- /opt/stacks:/opt/stacks
environment:
DOCKGE_STACKS_DIR: "/opt/stacks"
Open port 5001, create an admin account, start managing stacks. The one gotcha: the stacks directory path must be identical on both sides of the volume mount (/opt/stacks:/opt/stacks), and DOCKGE_STACKS_DIR must match. Get this wrong and Dockge will not detect your stacks.
Winner: Dockge for simplicity. It installs in under two minutes and conflicts with nothing. Cosmos installs quickly too, but it demands ports 80/443 and replaces your existing reverse proxy. If you factor in the total stack (Docker management + reverse proxy + SSL + auth), Cosmos is faster because it is one tool instead of four.
Performance and Resource Usage
| Metric | Cosmos Cloud | Dockge |
|---|---|---|
| Idle RAM | ~200-300 MB | ~30-50 MB |
| Under load RAM | ~400-500 MB | ~50-80 MB |
| Docker image size | ~200 MB | <50 MB |
| CPU at idle | Low-moderate | Minimal |
| Runtime | Go + embedded MongoDB | Node.js |
Cosmos uses 4-6x more memory than Dockge. That is expected — it runs a reverse proxy, auth system, VPN module, DDoS protection, and database internally. Compare Cosmos to the full equivalent stack: Dockge (~30 MB) + Nginx Proxy Manager (~150 MB) + Authelia (~50 MB) = ~230 MB. At that level, Cosmos’s ~250 MB idle usage is comparable.
On a Raspberry Pi 4 with 2 GB RAM or a small VPS, the difference matters. Dockge leaves 1.95 GB for your actual services. Cosmos leaves 1.7 GB. If you are running many containers on limited hardware, Dockge’s light footprint is a real advantage.
Winner: Dockge. Drastically lighter. But the comparison is only fair if you account for what Cosmos replaces.
Community and Support
| Metric | Cosmos Cloud | Dockge |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ~5,000 | ~14,000 |
| First release | 2023 | October 2023 |
| Latest release | v0.20.2 (active development) | v1.5.0 (March 2025) |
| Development pace | Active, frequent commits | Slowing — last release 11 months ago |
| License | Apache 2.0 | MIT |
| Documentation | Good, growing | GitHub README + community wiki |
| Creator/team | Azukaar (solo developer + contributors) | Louis Lam (Uptime Kuma developer) |
Both projects launched around the same time and are primarily solo-developer projects. Dockge has more GitHub stars, partly because of Louis Lam’s reputation from Uptime Kuma. Cosmos has a smaller but engaged community.
The development pace difference is notable. Cosmos is under active development with frequent releases through 2025 and into 2026. Dockge’s last release was v1.5.0 in March 2025 — over 11 months ago as of this writing. The project is not abandoned (Louis Lam is active on other projects), but development has clearly slowed. For a tool you depend on for daily Docker management, this is worth considering.
Winner: Split. Dockge has the larger community. Cosmos has more active development. Neither has a decisive advantage.
Use Cases
Choose Cosmos Cloud If…
- You are setting up a new server from scratch and want everything in one tool
- You want a reverse proxy, HTTPS, auth, and Docker management without configuring four separate services
- You are newer to self-hosting and want a guided setup experience
- You want an app marketplace where installing an app also configures its proxy route and SSL
- Security hardening (DDoS protection, geo-blocking, brute-force prevention) is a priority
- You need multi-user access with per-app permissions
- You want a built-in VPN for remote access to your services
Choose Dockge If…
- You already have a reverse proxy (NPM, Traefik, Caddy) and do not want to replace it
- You want a focused Compose file editor, not a platform
- You prefer your compose files stored as plain YAML on disk, not in a database
- You value minimal resource usage (30 MB vs 250 MB)
- You are a single user managing stacks on a single server
- You want to edit compose files outside the UI with any text editor
- You are running on limited hardware (Raspberry Pi, 1-2 GB RAM VPS)
- You want the
docker run-to-Compose converter
Final Verdict
Cosmos Cloud and Dockge are not really competitors — they solve different problems at different scales.
If you are starting from zero and want one tool that handles container management, reverse proxying, HTTPS, authentication, and security, Cosmos Cloud is the more efficient path. You skip the work of configuring NPM + Authelia + a Docker UI separately. The app marketplace with auto-configured proxy routes is genuinely excellent for getting services online fast. The trade-off is that you are locked into Cosmos’s way of doing things, and at v0.20.2 it is still a young project.
If you already have a working stack — a reverse proxy you like, auth that works, services running — Dockge is the better Docker management tool. It does not try to replace anything. It gives you a clean YAML editor, a deploy button, and real-time terminal output. Your compose files stay on disk as portable YAML. You can stop using Dockge tomorrow and nothing changes.
For experienced self-hosters, Dockge is the pragmatic choice. For newcomers who want a single-tool solution, Cosmos Cloud eliminates a lot of setup complexity. Pick based on whether you want a platform or a tool.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I run Cosmos Cloud and Dockge on the same server?
Technically yes, but there is no good reason to. Cosmos includes its own container management and Docker Compose support. Running Dockge alongside it would be redundant. Stacks created in Dockge would not automatically get Cosmos proxy routes, and containers managed by Cosmos would not appear as Dockge stacks. Pick one approach and commit to it.
Can Cosmos Cloud replace Dockge + Nginx Proxy Manager + Authelia?
For a single-server homelab, yes. Cosmos bundles equivalent functionality for all three tools. You lose Dockge’s on-disk compose file storage and NPM’s custom Nginx directive support, but for most self-hosters the bundled features are sufficient.
Is Dockge still actively maintained?
Dockge is functional and stable at v1.5.0, but the last release was March 2025. Louis Lam (also the creator of Uptime Kuma) has not indicated the project is abandoned, but development has slowed significantly. The tool works well for what it does — there may simply not be much to add.
Which is better for a Raspberry Pi?
Dockge, without question. At ~30 MB idle versus Cosmos’s ~250 MB, Dockge leaves far more headroom for your actual services. Cosmos’s embedded MongoDB alone can consume 100+ MB, which is significant on a 2 GB Pi. Pair Dockge with Nginx Proxy Manager or Caddy for a lighter overall stack.
Does Cosmos Cloud work without a domain name?
Cosmos can run with just an IP address during initial setup, but many features (Let’s Encrypt HTTPS, SSO, the full proxy setup) require a domain name. Without one, you are limited to self-signed certificates and local access. Dockge has no domain requirement at all.
Related
Get self-hosting tips in your inbox
New guides, comparisons, and setup tutorials — delivered weekly. No spam.