Grafana vs Uptime Kuma: Which to Self-Host?

Quick Verdict

These tools solve different problems. Uptime Kuma monitors whether your services are up and notifies you when they go down. Grafana visualizes metrics from multiple data sources to understand system performance and trends. Most self-hosters should start with Uptime Kuma for uptime alerts and add Grafana + Prometheus later when they need deeper infrastructure monitoring.

Overview

Uptime Kuma is a self-hosted uptime monitoring tool — it pings your services and alerts you when they’re down. Grafana is a visualization and dashboarding platform that connects to data sources like Prometheus, InfluxDB, and Loki to display metrics, logs, and alerts.

They’re complementary tools, not direct competitors. But many self-hosters ask which one they need, so the answer depends on what you’re monitoring.

Feature Comparison

FeatureGrafanaUptime Kuma
Primary purposeMetrics visualizationUptime monitoring
Setup complexityHigh (needs data sources)Low (standalone)
Data storageExternal (Prometheus, etc.)Built-in SQLite
Dashboard buildingAdvanced (queries, transforms)Pre-built status page
Alert channelsMany (via Alertmanager)90+ notification services
HTTP monitoringVia Blackbox ExporterBuilt-in
TCP/Ping monitoringVia Blackbox ExporterBuilt-in
DNS monitoringVia Blackbox ExporterBuilt-in
Docker monitoringVia cAdvisor/Node ExporterBuilt-in (Docker host)
Public status pageVia pluginsBuilt-in
RAM usage~200-400 MB (with Prometheus)~80-150 MB
Container count2-3 (Grafana + Prometheus + exporters)1
Learning curveSteepMinimal
Certificate expiry monitoringVia Blackbox ExporterBuilt-in
Response time graphsYes (detailed)Yes (basic)

Installation Complexity

Uptime Kuma is a single container with an SQLite database. Deploy it, open the web UI, add your monitors. The entire setup takes 5 minutes. No external dependencies, no configuration files, no queries to write.

Grafana alone is also a single container, but it’s useless without data sources. A typical monitoring stack is Grafana + Prometheus + Node Exporter (+ optionally cAdvisor, Loki, Alertmanager). That’s 3-6 containers, Prometheus configuration files, and learning PromQL to build dashboards.

Performance and Resource Usage

Uptime Kuma uses ~80-150 MB for monitoring dozens of services. The Grafana + Prometheus stack starts at ~400 MB and grows with the number of metrics being collected and the retention period.

Use Cases

Choose Uptime Kuma If…

  • You want to know when a service goes down and get notified
  • You want a public status page for your services
  • You want simple setup with no configuration files
  • You want certificate expiry monitoring
  • You’re monitoring external services (websites, APIs)
  • You want a clean dashboard without building it yourself

Choose Grafana (+ Prometheus) If…

  • You need to visualize CPU, memory, disk, and network metrics
  • You want historical trend analysis
  • You need to correlate metrics across multiple systems
  • You want custom dashboards with complex queries
  • You’re running a larger infrastructure (10+ services)
  • You need log aggregation alongside metrics

Use Both If…

  • You want uptime alerting (Uptime Kuma) AND infrastructure metrics (Grafana)
  • Many self-hosters run both — Uptime Kuma for the quick “is it up?” check and Grafana for deep-dive troubleshooting

Final Verdict

Start with Uptime Kuma. It answers the most common monitoring question — “are my services running?” — with minimal setup. The built-in status page and 90+ notification integrations make it immediately useful.

Add Grafana + Prometheus when you need deeper visibility into resource usage, performance trends, or when you’re running enough services that you need infrastructure-level monitoring. The learning curve is steeper but the visibility is unmatched.

Running both is common and recommended for any self-hoster with more than a handful of services.