Komga vs Stump: Comic & Manga Servers Compared
Quick Verdict
Komga is the better choice for most people. It has years of development behind it, a large community, polished metadata editing, and rock-solid stability. Stump is a promising Rust-based alternative that uses a fraction of the RAM and feels snappier, but it has no stable release yet and is missing features Komga already ships. Pick Komga if you want something that works today. Pick Stump if you want to bet on a faster, leaner future and can tolerate rough edges.
Overview
Both Komga and Stump are self-hosted comic and manga servers that organize your library, serve content over OPDS, and track reading progress through a web UI. They solve the same problem — managing a large collection of CBZ, CBR, PDF, and EPUB files without relying on cloud services or desktop-only readers.
Komga has been around since 2019. It is written in Kotlin on Spring Boot, backed by SQLite or H2, and has a mature ecosystem of compatible reading apps. The community is active, documentation is thorough, and the feature set is comprehensive.
Stump is a newer project written in Rust. It prioritizes performance and low resource usage. Development is active but there is no stable release — you run the nightly tag. The feature set is growing quickly but has gaps compared to Komga.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Komga | Stump |
|---|---|---|
| Language / Runtime | Kotlin (JVM / Spring Boot) | Rust |
| Supported Formats | CBZ, CBR, PDF, EPUB | CBZ, CBR, PDF, EPUB |
| OPDS Support | Yes (OPDS 1.2 + PSE) | Yes (OPDS 1.2) |
| Web Reader | Built-in, full-featured | Built-in, functional |
| Metadata Editing | Rich inline editing, ComicInfo.xml support | Basic metadata support |
| Reading Lists | Yes, manual and smart collections | Yes, with smart filters |
| Book Clubs | No | Yes |
| Multi-User Support | Yes, with per-library permissions | Yes, with library-level access control |
| Reading Progress Sync | Yes, syncs across OPDS clients | Yes |
| Database | SQLite or H2 | SQLite |
| Docker Image Size | ~250 MB | ~80 MB |
| Idle RAM Usage | ~200 MB | ~50 MB |
| API | REST API, well-documented | REST API, evolving |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Stable Release | Yes (v1.16.x) | No (nightly only) |
| Community Size | Large, active Discord and GitHub | Smaller, growing |
Installation
Komga Docker Compose
Create a docker-compose.yml:
services:
komga:
image: gotson/komga:1.16.1
container_name: komga
restart: unless-stopped
ports:
- "25600:25600"
environment:
# JVM memory limit — adjust based on library size
- JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS=-Xmx512m
volumes:
# Application config and database
- komga-config:/config
# Your comic/manga library — change the left side to your library path
- /path/to/your/comics:/data:ro
user: "1000:1000"
volumes:
komga-config:
Start it:
docker compose up -d
Access the web UI at http://your-server:25600. Create your admin account on first launch, then add your library path (/data) through the settings.
Stump Docker Compose
Create a docker-compose.yml:
services:
stump:
image: stumpapp/stump:nightly
container_name: stump
restart: unless-stopped
ports:
- "10801:10801"
environment:
# Directory where Stump stores its config and database
- STUMP_CONFIG_DIR=/config
volumes:
# Application config and database
- stump-config:/config
# Your comic/manga library — change the left side to your library path
- /path/to/your/comics:/data:ro
user: "1000:1000"
volumes:
stump-config:
Start it:
docker compose up -d
Access the web UI at http://your-server:10801. Walk through the setup wizard to create your admin account and point it at /data.
Installation Complexity
Both are straightforward single-container deployments with no external database dependencies. Komga uses slightly more boilerplate because of the JVM memory flag, but neither requires more than a few minutes to get running.
Komga’s documentation is more mature, with detailed guides for every configuration option. Stump’s docs are adequate but thinner — expect to check GitHub issues for edge cases.
Performance and Resource Usage
This is where Stump pulls ahead decisively. Rust compiles to native code with no garbage collector overhead. Stump idles at around 50 MB of RAM. Komga runs on the JVM and idles at around 200 MB, often climbing higher during library scans on large collections.
Library scanning speed favors Stump as well. On a 10,000-file manga library, Stump completes an initial scan noticeably faster. Page rendering in the web reader feels snappier in Stump, particularly for high-resolution manga pages.
If you are running a comic server alongside a dozen other containers on a Raspberry Pi or a low-end mini PC, Stump’s resource efficiency matters. On a machine with 8 GB or more of RAM, the difference is less relevant.
Community and Support
Komga has a significant head start. The Discord is active with hundreds of users, GitHub issues get triaged regularly, and there is a broad ecosystem of compatible OPDS readers (Tachiyomi/Mihon, Panels, Chunky) that are tested against Komga specifically.
Stump’s community is smaller but enthusiastic. The developer is responsive on GitHub and Discord. Because Stump is still pre-release, you should expect breaking changes between nightly builds. The pace of development is fast — features land frequently — but stability is not guaranteed between updates.
Use Cases
Choose Komga If…
- You want a stable, production-ready server you can set up and forget
- Metadata management matters to you — editing ComicInfo.xml tags, organizing series, curating collections
- You rely on OPDS reader apps and want the widest compatibility
- You have a large library and need proven reliability at scale
- You prefer mature documentation and a large community for troubleshooting
Choose Stump If…
- You are running on constrained hardware and need minimal RAM usage
- You value raw performance and fast page loads over feature completeness
- You want book club features for sharing reading experiences with others
- You are comfortable running nightly builds and reporting bugs
- You want to support a promising open-source project early in its development
Final Verdict
Komga is the right choice for most self-hosters today. It is stable, feature-complete for the core use case, and has a proven track record with a large user base. The metadata editing alone sets it apart — if you care about organizing your library properly, Komga does it better.
Stump is the one to watch. The performance advantage is real, book clubs are a unique feature, and the Rust foundation gives it a strong technical future. But running nightly builds as your primary server means accepting risk. If you are the type who enjoys riding the bleeding edge and does not mind the occasional breakage, Stump rewards you with speed and efficiency.
For a primary, set-and-forget comic server: Komga. For a secondary server or a low-resource environment where you can tolerate instability: Stump.
Related
Get self-hosting tips in your inbox
Get the Docker Compose configs, hardware picks, and setup shortcuts we don't put in articles. Weekly. No spam.
Comments