NocoDB vs Baserow: Which Airtable Alternative?
Quick Verdict
NocoDB wins if you need to put a spreadsheet interface on an existing database — it connects to PostgreSQL, MySQL, or SQL Server without migrating data. Baserow wins if you want to build no-code applications, not just manage data. For pure Airtable replacement, NocoDB is simpler to deploy and more flexible with data sources.
Overview
Both apps give you an Airtable-like spreadsheet interface on your own server. They share the same core concept — structured data with views, forms, and APIs — but diverge significantly in scope and philosophy.
NocoDB (first released 2021) focuses on being a database UI layer. Its killer feature is connecting to existing databases and instantly creating a spreadsheet interface on top of them. It’s lightweight and stays in its lane.
Baserow (first released 2020) has evolved into a no-code platform. Beyond the spreadsheet, it includes an application builder, workflow automation, dashboards, and AI tools. It’s broader but requires more resources.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | NocoDB | Baserow |
|---|---|---|
| View types | Grid, Gallery, Kanban, Form, Calendar | Grid, Gallery, Kanban, Form, Calendar |
| Field types | 22+ (Link, Lookup, Rollup, Formula, QR, Barcode) | 20+ (Link, Lookup, Formula, AI, File) |
| External database support | Yes — PostgreSQL, MySQL, SQL Server, SQLite | No — PostgreSQL only (own data) |
| Application builder | No | Yes — publish full apps on your domain |
| Workflow automation | Webhooks only (use n8n/Zapier) | Built-in automation engine |
| Dashboards | No native dashboards | Yes — data visualization built-in |
| AI features | No | Yes — AI assistant and auto-generation |
| REST API | Auto-generated for every table | Full REST API, headless-first |
| Shared views | Yes (with optional password) | Yes |
| Audit log | Yes | Yes (premium) |
| Import/Export | CSV, Excel, Airtable, JSON | CSV, JSON, XML, Airtable |
| Plugin system | API-based extensions | Plugin architecture for fields, views, endpoints |
| LDAP/SSO | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| License | Sustainable Use License (source-available) | MIT (core, OSI-approved open source) |
Deployment Complexity
NocoDB is significantly easier to deploy and maintain.
| Aspect | NocoDB | Baserow |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum services | 1 (SQLite mode) | 1 (all-in-one container) |
| Production services | 2 (NocoDB + PostgreSQL) | 9 (backend, frontend, 3 Celery workers, PostgreSQL, Redis, Caddy, init container) |
| Docker image | nocodb/nocodb:0.301.2 | baserow/baserow:2.1.1 |
| PostgreSQL version | 16.6 | 15 with pgvector |
| Redis required | Optional (improves caching) | Required |
| First-start time | ~30 seconds | ~60-90 seconds |
NocoDB minimal setup:
services:
nocodb:
image: nocodb/nocodb:0.301.2
ports:
- "8080:8080"
volumes:
- nocodb-data:/usr/app/data
restart: unless-stopped
volumes:
nocodb-data:
That’s it — a single container with SQLite. Add PostgreSQL for production.
Baserow minimal setup:
services:
baserow:
image: baserow/baserow:2.1.1
ports:
- "80:80"
volumes:
- baserow-data:/baserow/data
environment:
BASEROW_PUBLIC_URL: "http://localhost"
restart: unless-stopped
volumes:
baserow-data:
Also a single container, but it bundles Django, Nuxt.js, Celery, PostgreSQL, Redis, and Caddy inside one image. This works for small deployments but limits scalability.
Resource Usage
| Resource | NocoDB | Baserow |
|---|---|---|
| RAM (idle) | ~200 MB | ~800 MB (all-in-one) |
| RAM (production) | 500 MB - 1 GB | 2-4 GB |
| CPU | Low | Medium |
| Disk (base) | ~300 MB | ~2 GB |
| Architecture | amd64, arm64 | amd64, arm64 |
NocoDB is roughly 4x lighter on resources. This matters on budget VPS instances or Raspberry Pi deployments.
The External Database Advantage
NocoDB’s ability to connect to existing databases is a genuine differentiator, not just a feature checkbox. If your team already has a PostgreSQL or MySQL database with real data, NocoDB can:
- Connect to it without copying or migrating data
- Auto-detect the schema and present it as a spreadsheet
- Let non-technical team members browse, filter, and edit records
- Generate API endpoints for that existing data
Baserow cannot do this — it only works with its own PostgreSQL instance. You’d need to import data, which creates a sync problem.
The No-Code Platform Advantage
Baserow’s application builder is equally distinctive. You can:
- Build multi-page applications with forms, tables, and charts
- Publish them on your own domain
- Control access with user roles
- Automate workflows without external tools
NocoDB doesn’t attempt this. If you need more than a spreadsheet UI — if you want to build internal tools or customer-facing apps — Baserow is the more capable platform.
Licensing
This is worth considering. Baserow’s core is MIT-licensed (genuine open source, OSI-approved). NocoDB uses a “Sustainable Use License” — source-available but with restrictions on commercial redistribution. For personal and internal business use, both are free. But if licensing freedom matters to you (or your legal team), Baserow has cleaner terms.
Community and Development
| Metric | NocoDB | Baserow |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | 51K+ | 21K+ |
| Release frequency | Weekly patches | Monthly releases |
| First release | 2021 | 2020 |
| Primary language | TypeScript/Node.js | Python/Django + Nuxt.js |
| Backing | NocoDB Inc. | Baserow (Bram Wiepjes) |
Both projects are actively maintained with regular releases.
Use Cases
Choose NocoDB If…
- You have an existing database and want a spreadsheet UI on top of it
- You want the simplest possible deployment (1-2 containers)
- You’re running on limited hardware (Raspberry Pi, small VPS)
- You primarily need a data management interface, not an app builder
- You want auto-generated APIs for existing data
Choose Baserow If…
- You want to build no-code applications, not just manage data
- You need built-in workflow automation (no external tools)
- You need data visualization dashboards
- MIT licensing is important to your organization
- You’re comfortable with a heavier deployment (more RAM, more services)
Final Verdict
For most self-hosters replacing Airtable, NocoDB is the better starting point. It’s lighter, easier to deploy, and its external database support is a feature no competitor matches. You get a fully functional Airtable alternative in a single Docker container.
Choose Baserow when you’ve outgrown “just a spreadsheet” and need the application builder, automation, and dashboard capabilities. It’s a more powerful platform, but that power comes with more complexity and higher resource requirements.
Related
Get self-hosting tips in your inbox
New guides, comparisons, and setup tutorials — delivered weekly. No spam.