Self-Hosted Alternatives to GitBook

Why Replace GitBook?

GitBook’s free plan is limited to one public space with one user. The Plus plan is $8/user/month, and Business is $13/user/month. For teams:

  • Cost scales fast. A team of 10 on Business pays $1,560/year for what is essentially a documentation site.
  • Data lives on their servers. Your product documentation, internal docs, and knowledge base are hosted by GitBook. If they change pricing, policies, or shut down, your docs go with them.
  • Limited customization. GitBook’s theming is constrained. Self-hosted tools give you full control over design, layout, and functionality.
  • Git sync limitations. GitBook’s Git sync — once its core feature — now has restrictions on the free plan. Self-hosted alternatives like Wiki.js offer Git sync without limitations.

Best Alternatives

Wiki.js — Best for Git-Synced Documentation

Wiki.js is the closest self-hosted replacement for GitBook. It supports Markdown natively, syncs content to a Git repository bidirectionally, has a polished editor with live preview, and serves clean documentation pages. The Git sync means your docs live in your repo — edit locally in VS Code or through the web UI.

How it compares to GitBook:

  • Bidirectional Git sync (GitBook’s is increasingly restricted)
  • Markdown and WYSIWYG editors
  • Multiple authentication providers
  • Missing: GitBook’s AI search, analytics dashboard

Setup complexity: Low. Docker Compose with PostgreSQL.

[Read our full guide: How to Self-Host Wiki.js]

BookStack — Best for Structured Product Docs

BookStack organizes content into books, chapters, and pages — a natural fit for product documentation. The WYSIWYG editor is reliable, the API allows automation, and the search is excellent.

How it compares to GitBook:

  • Better organizational hierarchy (shelves > books > chapters > pages)
  • API for programmatic content management
  • Role-based access control at every level
  • Missing: Git sync, GitBook’s polished published-site experience

Setup complexity: Low. Docker Compose with MySQL.

[Read our full guide: How to Self-Host BookStack]

Docusaurus — Best for Developer Documentation

Docusaurus is Facebook’s open-source documentation framework. It generates static documentation sites from Markdown files, supports versioning, i18n, and search. It’s not a wiki — it’s a static site generator optimized for docs.

How it compares to GitBook:

  • Static site generation (faster, more customizable)
  • Documentation versioning (tied to software releases)
  • Full React-based customization
  • Missing: web-based editing, real-time collaboration
  • Requires: developer workflow (edit Markdown, commit, build, deploy)

Setup complexity: Medium. Requires Node.js build pipeline. No Docker Compose one-click setup — it’s a dev tool.

MkDocs with Material Theme — Best for Simple Docs

MkDocs generates documentation sites from Markdown. The Material theme makes them look professional. Like Docusaurus, it’s a static site generator — no web editor, no database.

How it compares to GitBook:

  • Clean, fast documentation sites
  • Markdown files in a Git repo — edit with any text editor
  • Search, versioning, and theming
  • Missing: web-based editing, user management, collaboration

Setup complexity: Low. Python-based. mkdocs serve for local dev, static output for deployment.

Docmost — Best Collaborative Option

Docmost is a newer wiki with a Notion-like block editor, real-time collaboration, and team spaces. While not a documentation-specific tool like GitBook, it works well for internal docs.

How it compares to GitBook:

  • Block-based editor with real-time collaboration
  • Team spaces for organization
  • Missing: versioning, published-site generation, Git sync

Setup complexity: Low. Docker Compose with PostgreSQL.

[Read our full guide: How to Self-Host Docmost]

Migration Guide

Exporting from GitBook

  1. If Git sync is enabled, your content is already in your repository as Markdown
  2. Otherwise, use GitBook’s export feature or the API to download content
  3. Content exports as Markdown files with SUMMARY.md for structure

Importing into Wiki.js

  1. Configure Git sync in Wiki.js to point to your documentation repository
  2. Wiki.js pulls the Markdown files and creates pages automatically
  3. Review navigation structure and update internal links

Importing into BookStack

  1. Create a book structure matching your GitBook space
  2. Import Markdown files into BookStack pages
  3. BookStack converts Markdown to rich text
  4. Review formatting and fix any rendering issues

Cost Comparison

GitBook (10 users)Self-Hosted Wiki.js
Monthly cost$80-$130/month$5-$10/month (VPS)
Annual cost$960-$1,560/year$60-$120/year
3-year cost$2,880-$4,680$180-$360
SpacesLimited (plan-dependent)Unlimited
Git syncRestricted on free planFull bidirectional
Custom domainPaid plans onlyYour domain
PrivacyGitBook serversFull control

What You Give Up

  • Published site polish. GitBook generates clean, professional documentation sites out of the box. Self-hosted tools require more configuration to achieve the same look.
  • AI features. GitBook’s AI search and writing assistant have no self-hosted equivalent (though you can integrate Ollama or other LLMs).
  • Zero maintenance. GitBook is SaaS — they handle uptime, updates, and infrastructure. Self-hosting means you manage all of this.
  • Change requests. GitBook’s change request workflow (similar to pull requests) is built in. Wiki.js achieves this via Git sync, but BookStack and Docmost don’t have this feature.