Self-Hosted Alternatives to GitBook
Why Replace GitBook?
GitBook’s free plan is limited to one public space with one user. The Plus plan is $8/user/month, and Business is $13/user/month. For teams:
- Cost scales fast. A team of 10 on Business pays $1,560/year for what is essentially a documentation site.
- Data lives on their servers. Your product documentation, internal docs, and knowledge base are hosted by GitBook. If they change pricing, policies, or shut down, your docs go with them.
- Limited customization. GitBook’s theming is constrained. Self-hosted tools give you full control over design, layout, and functionality.
- Git sync limitations. GitBook’s Git sync — once its core feature — now has restrictions on the free plan. Self-hosted alternatives like Wiki.js offer Git sync without limitations.
Best Alternatives
Wiki.js — Best for Git-Synced Documentation
Wiki.js is the closest self-hosted replacement for GitBook. It supports Markdown natively, syncs content to a Git repository bidirectionally, has a polished editor with live preview, and serves clean documentation pages. The Git sync means your docs live in your repo — edit locally in VS Code or through the web UI.
How it compares to GitBook:
- Bidirectional Git sync (GitBook’s is increasingly restricted)
- Markdown and WYSIWYG editors
- Multiple authentication providers
- Missing: GitBook’s AI search, analytics dashboard
Setup complexity: Low. Docker Compose with PostgreSQL.
[Read our full guide: How to Self-Host Wiki.js]
BookStack — Best for Structured Product Docs
BookStack organizes content into books, chapters, and pages — a natural fit for product documentation. The WYSIWYG editor is reliable, the API allows automation, and the search is excellent.
How it compares to GitBook:
- Better organizational hierarchy (shelves > books > chapters > pages)
- API for programmatic content management
- Role-based access control at every level
- Missing: Git sync, GitBook’s polished published-site experience
Setup complexity: Low. Docker Compose with MySQL.
[Read our full guide: How to Self-Host BookStack]
Docusaurus — Best for Developer Documentation
Docusaurus is Facebook’s open-source documentation framework. It generates static documentation sites from Markdown files, supports versioning, i18n, and search. It’s not a wiki — it’s a static site generator optimized for docs.
How it compares to GitBook:
- Static site generation (faster, more customizable)
- Documentation versioning (tied to software releases)
- Full React-based customization
- Missing: web-based editing, real-time collaboration
- Requires: developer workflow (edit Markdown, commit, build, deploy)
Setup complexity: Medium. Requires Node.js build pipeline. No Docker Compose one-click setup — it’s a dev tool.
MkDocs with Material Theme — Best for Simple Docs
MkDocs generates documentation sites from Markdown. The Material theme makes them look professional. Like Docusaurus, it’s a static site generator — no web editor, no database.
How it compares to GitBook:
- Clean, fast documentation sites
- Markdown files in a Git repo — edit with any text editor
- Search, versioning, and theming
- Missing: web-based editing, user management, collaboration
Setup complexity: Low. Python-based. mkdocs serve for local dev, static output for deployment.
Docmost — Best Collaborative Option
Docmost is a newer wiki with a Notion-like block editor, real-time collaboration, and team spaces. While not a documentation-specific tool like GitBook, it works well for internal docs.
How it compares to GitBook:
- Block-based editor with real-time collaboration
- Team spaces for organization
- Missing: versioning, published-site generation, Git sync
Setup complexity: Low. Docker Compose with PostgreSQL.
[Read our full guide: How to Self-Host Docmost]
Migration Guide
Exporting from GitBook
- If Git sync is enabled, your content is already in your repository as Markdown
- Otherwise, use GitBook’s export feature or the API to download content
- Content exports as Markdown files with SUMMARY.md for structure
Importing into Wiki.js
- Configure Git sync in Wiki.js to point to your documentation repository
- Wiki.js pulls the Markdown files and creates pages automatically
- Review navigation structure and update internal links
Importing into BookStack
- Create a book structure matching your GitBook space
- Import Markdown files into BookStack pages
- BookStack converts Markdown to rich text
- Review formatting and fix any rendering issues
Cost Comparison
| GitBook (10 users) | Self-Hosted Wiki.js | |
|---|---|---|
| Monthly cost | $80-$130/month | $5-$10/month (VPS) |
| Annual cost | $960-$1,560/year | $60-$120/year |
| 3-year cost | $2,880-$4,680 | $180-$360 |
| Spaces | Limited (plan-dependent) | Unlimited |
| Git sync | Restricted on free plan | Full bidirectional |
| Custom domain | Paid plans only | Your domain |
| Privacy | GitBook servers | Full control |
What You Give Up
- Published site polish. GitBook generates clean, professional documentation sites out of the box. Self-hosted tools require more configuration to achieve the same look.
- AI features. GitBook’s AI search and writing assistant have no self-hosted equivalent (though you can integrate Ollama or other LLMs).
- Zero maintenance. GitBook is SaaS — they handle uptime, updates, and infrastructure. Self-hosting means you manage all of this.
- Change requests. GitBook’s change request workflow (similar to pull requests) is built in. Wiki.js achieves this via Git sync, but BookStack and Docmost don’t have this feature.
Related
Get self-hosting tips in your inbox
New guides, comparisons, and setup tutorials — delivered weekly. No spam.