Rocket.Chat vs Mattermost: Self-Hosted Slack Alternative
The Bottom Line
Mattermost is the better self-hosted Slack replacement for most teams. It is lighter on resources, simpler to deploy, and its interface will feel immediately familiar to anyone coming from Slack. Rocket.Chat tries to be everything — team chat, customer support, omnichannel platform — and that ambition comes at the cost of complexity and heavier resource requirements. If you just need internal team communication, pick Mattermost. If you need a unified platform that handles customer-facing live chat alongside internal messaging, Rocket.Chat earns its overhead.
What Each Platform Actually Is
Rocket.Chat is an open-source communications platform that started as a Slack clone and evolved into an omnichannel hub. It handles internal team messaging, live chat widgets for websites, integration with WhatsApp/SMS/email, and video conferencing. It runs on Node.js with MongoDB as its database. The project is backed by Rocket.Chat Technologies Ltd. and offers both a community edition and enterprise tiers.
Mattermost is an open-source team messaging platform focused squarely on replacing Slack for internal communication. It provides channels, direct messages, threads, file sharing, and integrations. It runs on Go with PostgreSQL as its database. Mattermost Inc. offers a free Team Edition and a paid Enterprise Edition.
Both are mature, actively maintained, and have large communities. The difference is scope: Mattermost does one thing well. Rocket.Chat does many things.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Rocket.Chat | Mattermost |
|---|---|---|
| Core messaging (channels, DMs, threads) | Yes | Yes |
| Omnichannel / live chat widget | Yes (built-in) | No (third-party integrations only) |
| WhatsApp / SMS / email integration | Yes (native) | No |
| Video & voice calls | Yes (Jitsi, built-in) | Yes (plugin-based Calls) |
| Screen sharing | Yes | Yes (via Calls plugin) |
| End-to-end encryption | Yes (opt-in per room) | No (TLS in transit only) |
| SSO / LDAP / SAML | Yes | Yes (SAML/LDAP in Enterprise) |
| Custom emoji & reactions | Yes | Yes |
| Message editing & deletion | Yes | Yes |
| File sharing & previews | Yes | Yes |
| Threaded conversations | Yes | Yes |
| Slash commands & bots | Yes | Yes |
| Webhooks (incoming/outgoing) | Yes | Yes |
| App marketplace / plugins | Yes (marketplace) | Yes (plugin system) |
| Mobile apps (iOS/Android) | Yes | Yes |
| Desktop apps | Yes (Electron) | Yes (Electron) |
| Guest access | Yes | Enterprise only |
| Message read receipts | Yes | Enterprise only |
| Compliance / message export | Enterprise | Enterprise |
| Federation (server-to-server) | Yes (Matrix bridge) | No |
| Database | MongoDB | PostgreSQL |
| Primary language | Node.js / TypeScript | Go |
Docker Compose: Rocket.Chat
Rocket.Chat requires MongoDB configured as a replica set. This is non-negotiable — the application will not start without oplog access.
Create a docker-compose.yml:
services:
rocketchat:
image: registry.rocket.chat/rocketchat/rocket.chat:8.1.1
restart: unless-stopped
environment:
- MONGO_URL=mongodb://mongodb:27017/rocketchat?replicaSet=rs0
- MONGO_OPLOG_URL=mongodb://mongodb:27017/local?replicaSet=rs0
- ROOT_URL=http://localhost:3000
- PORT=3000
- DEPLOY_METHOD=docker
ports:
- "3000:3000"
volumes:
- rocketchat_uploads:/app/uploads
depends_on:
mongodb:
condition: service_healthy
networks:
- rocketchat
mongodb:
image: mongodb/mongodb-community-server:8.0-ubi8
restart: unless-stopped
command: --oplogSize 128 --replSet rs0
volumes:
- mongodb_data:/data/db
healthcheck:
test: >
mongosh --quiet --eval "
try { rs.status().ok } catch(e) {
rs.initiate({_id:'rs0', members:[{_id:0, host:'mongodb:27017'}]}).ok
}"
interval: 10s
timeout: 10s
retries: 5
start_period: 30s
networks:
- rocketchat
volumes:
mongodb_data:
rocketchat_uploads:
networks:
rocketchat:
Create a .env file:
# Change ROOT_URL to your actual domain in production
# ROOT_URL=https://chat.example.com
Start the stack:
docker compose up -d
MongoDB needs a few seconds to initialize the replica set on first boot. Watch the logs:
docker compose logs -f rocketchat
Once you see SERVER RUNNING, visit http://localhost:3000. The setup wizard walks you through creating the admin account, organization name, and server registration (registration is optional — skip it to stay fully self-hosted).
Docker Compose: Mattermost
Mattermost uses PostgreSQL and has a straightforward deployment. The official repository provides a well-structured setup.
Create a docker-compose.yml:
services:
mattermost:
image: mattermost/mattermost-team-edition:10.5.1
restart: unless-stopped
pids_limit: 200
security_opt:
- no-new-privileges:true
tmpfs:
- /tmp
environment:
- TZ=UTC
- MM_SQLSETTINGS_DRIVERNAME=postgres
- MM_SQLSETTINGS_DATASOURCE=postgres://mmuser:mmuser_password@postgres:5432/mattermost?sslmode=disable&connect_timeout=10
- MM_BLEVESETTINGS_INDEXDIR=/mattermost/bleve-indexes
- MM_SERVICESETTINGS_SITEURL=http://localhost:8065
ports:
- "8065:8065"
- "8443:8443/udp"
- "8443:8443/tcp"
volumes:
- mattermost_config:/mattermost/config
- mattermost_data:/mattermost/data
- mattermost_logs:/mattermost/logs
- mattermost_plugins:/mattermost/plugins
- mattermost_client_plugins:/mattermost/client/plugins
- mattermost_bleve:/mattermost/bleve-indexes
depends_on:
postgres:
condition: service_healthy
networks:
- mattermost
postgres:
image: postgres:16-alpine
restart: unless-stopped
security_opt:
- no-new-privileges:true
pids_limit: 100
read_only: true
tmpfs:
- /tmp
- /var/run/postgresql
environment:
- TZ=UTC
- POSTGRES_USER=mmuser
- POSTGRES_PASSWORD=mmuser_password
- POSTGRES_DB=mattermost
volumes:
- postgres_data:/var/lib/postgresql/data
healthcheck:
test: ["CMD-SHELL", "pg_isready -U mmuser -d mattermost"]
interval: 10s
timeout: 5s
retries: 5
networks:
- mattermost
volumes:
mattermost_config:
mattermost_data:
mattermost_logs:
mattermost_plugins:
mattermost_client_plugins:
mattermost_bleve:
postgres_data:
networks:
mattermost:
Start the stack:
docker compose up -d
Visit http://localhost:8065. Create your first account — the first user automatically becomes the system administrator. No setup wizard. No registration prompts. You are in.
Important: Change mmuser_password to a strong password before deploying to production. Set MM_SERVICESETTINGS_SITEURL to your actual domain.
Installation Complexity
Mattermost wins here decisively.
Mattermost is a single binary backed by PostgreSQL. The Docker Compose file is clean. docker compose up -d, create an account, done. PostgreSQL is the most battle-tested relational database on earth. If you have run any web application before, you already know how to back up and maintain it.
Rocket.Chat requires MongoDB with replica set mode enabled. MongoDB replica sets add operational complexity — you need the oplog configured correctly, and the health check must initialize the replica set on first boot. The compose file is more involved. The setup wizard has more steps. It works, but there are more moving parts that can break.
Time from docker compose up to a working chat room:
- Mattermost: ~2 minutes
- Rocket.Chat: ~5 minutes (MongoDB replica set initialization + setup wizard)
Performance and Resource Usage
| Resource | Rocket.Chat | Mattermost |
|---|---|---|
| RAM (idle, small team) | ~800 MB - 1.2 GB | ~300-500 MB |
| RAM (50 users, active) | ~1.5-2.5 GB | ~600 MB - 1 GB |
| CPU (idle) | Low-Medium | Low |
| CPU (active messaging) | Medium | Low |
| Disk (application) | ~1 GB | ~500 MB |
| Database engine | MongoDB (memory-hungry) | PostgreSQL (efficient) |
| Minimum recommended RAM | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Recommended RAM (production) | 4 GB+ | 2 GB+ |
Rocket.Chat’s Node.js runtime and MongoDB backend consume significantly more memory than Mattermost’s Go binary and PostgreSQL. On a small VPS with 2 GB RAM, Mattermost runs comfortably. Rocket.Chat will struggle under load at that level.
Mattermost’s Go backend is also more predictable under load. Node.js can exhibit garbage collection pauses that cause brief latency spikes during heavy usage. For teams under 50 users, neither matters. Above that, Mattermost scales more gracefully on modest hardware.
Community and Ecosystem
Rocket.Chat has a large community (39k+ GitHub stars), an active marketplace for apps and integrations, and strong international adoption. Documentation is comprehensive but sometimes lags behind releases. The omnichannel features attract businesses that need customer support tooling alongside internal chat.
Mattermost has a similarly large community (31k+ GitHub stars), an extensive plugin ecosystem, and strong adoption in security-conscious organizations (government, defense, finance). Documentation is excellent — consistently up to date and well-organized. The DevOps and developer tooling integrations (Jira, GitHub, GitLab, Jenkins) are particularly polished.
Both projects are actively maintained with regular releases. Mattermost follows a predictable monthly release cycle. Rocket.Chat releases are less predictable but frequent.
Use Cases
Choose Rocket.Chat If…
- You need omnichannel support — live chat widgets on your website, WhatsApp integration, email routing to chat agents
- You want end-to-end encryption for sensitive conversations
- You need federation between multiple chat servers (Matrix bridge support)
- You are replacing both Slack (internal) and Intercom/Zendesk (customer-facing) with a single platform
- You need a unified communications hub, not just team messaging
Choose Mattermost If…
- You want a clean Slack replacement for internal team communication
- You are running on limited hardware (1-2 GB RAM VPS)
- You want the simplest possible deployment and maintenance
- Your team already uses PostgreSQL and you want to keep your database stack consistent
- You need strong DevOps integrations (CI/CD, incident response, developer workflows)
- You prioritize a Slack-like UX that your team can adopt without training
Final Verdict
Mattermost is the right choice for most self-hosters. It does one thing — team messaging — and does it exceptionally well. The deployment is simple, the resource usage is modest, the Slack-like interface requires zero training, and PostgreSQL is a database you already know how to operate. For a team that just needs to stop paying for Slack, Mattermost is the answer.
Rocket.Chat earns its place when you need more than team chat. If your business handles customer conversations alongside internal messaging — live chat, WhatsApp, email routing — Rocket.Chat consolidates those into one platform. That is genuinely valuable. But if you do not need omnichannel, you are paying the complexity and resource tax for features you will never use.
Pick Mattermost unless you have a specific reason to pick Rocket.Chat. You probably know if you do.
Related
Get self-hosting tips in your inbox
New guides, comparisons, and setup tutorials — delivered weekly. No spam.