Self-Hosted Alternatives to Canny
Why Replace Canny?
Canny charges $79/month for the Growth plan (unlimited tracked users, 1 board) and $359/month for Business (multiple boards, user segmentation, integrations). The free tier caps you at 100 tracked users and 1 board — enough for a demo, not for a real product.
Updated February 2026: Verified with latest Docker images and configurations.
That’s $948-4,308/year for what amounts to a voting board and a changelog page. The core functionality — let users submit ideas, vote on them, and track status — is straightforward to self-host.
Privacy is another concern. Canny collects user data, browsing behavior, and usage patterns. If your product handles sensitive data, running user feedback through a third-party SaaS adds another vendor to your privacy posture.
Best Alternatives
Fider — Best Direct Replacement
Fider is an open-source feedback platform that matches Canny’s core workflow: users submit ideas, vote, comment, and track status changes. It includes user authentication (email, OAuth), customizable branding, and a public roadmap. Built in Go, it’s lightweight and fast.
services:
fider:
image: getfider/fider:0.22.2
container_name: fider
restart: unless-stopped
ports:
- "3000:3000"
environment:
BASE_URL: https://feedback.example.com
DATABASE_URL: postgres://fider:change-this-password@db:5432/fider?sslmode=disable
JWT_SECRET: change-this-to-a-random-64-char-string
EMAIL_NOREPLY: [email protected]
EMAIL_SMTP_HOST: smtp.example.com
EMAIL_SMTP_PORT: "587"
EMAIL_SMTP_USERNAME: ""
EMAIL_SMTP_PASSWORD: ""
EMAIL_SMTP_ENABLE_STARTTLS: "true"
depends_on:
db:
condition: service_healthy
db:
image: postgres:16-alpine
container_name: fider-db
restart: unless-stopped
environment:
POSTGRES_DB: fider
POSTGRES_USER: fider
POSTGRES_PASSWORD: change-this-password
volumes:
- fider_data:/var/lib/postgresql/data
healthcheck:
test: ["CMD-SHELL", "pg_isready -U fider"]
interval: 10s
timeout: 5s
retries: 5
volumes:
fider_data:
Fider gives you idea submission with voting, status tracking (Open, Started, Completed, Declined), user authentication, email notifications, and API access. It lacks Canny’s deeper analytics (user segmentation, priority scoring by MRR) but covers the core feedback loop well.
Formbricks — Best for In-App Surveys
Formbricks is an open-source experience management platform. While not a direct Canny replacement, it excels at collecting user feedback through in-app surveys, NPS scores, and targeted questions. If your feedback collection happens inside your product rather than on a separate board, Formbricks is a better fit than Fider.
[Read our full guide: How to Self-Host Formbricks]
HeyForm — Best for Standalone Feedback Forms
HeyForm is a conversational form builder that works well for collecting structured feedback. Create a feedback form with conditional logic and embed it on your site or share a direct link. Less feature-rich than Fider for ongoing feature voting, but simpler to set up for one-off feedback collection.
[Read our full guide: How to Self-Host HeyForm]
Migration Guide
Canny offers CSV export of your feedback data. Export your ideas, votes, and comments, then import into Fider via its REST API:
- Export from Canny: Settings → Data Export → Download CSV
- Set up Fider using the Docker Compose config above
- Import ideas via API:
curl -X POST https://feedback.example.com/api/v1/posts \ -H "Authorization: Bearer YOUR_API_KEY" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"title": "Feature idea title", "description": "Full description"}' - Redirect users from your old Canny board URL to your new Fider instance
Note: Vote counts and user accounts won’t transfer — users will need to re-register and re-vote. Prioritize migrating the ideas themselves and their status.
Cost Comparison
| Canny Growth | Canny Business | Fider (Self-Hosted) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly cost | $79/month | $359/month | $0 (own hardware) or $5/month (VPS) |
| Annual cost | $948 | $4,308 | $0-60 |
| 3-year cost | $2,844 | $12,924 | $0-180 |
| Tracked users | Unlimited | Unlimited | Unlimited |
| Boards | 1 | Multiple | Unlimited (deploy multiple instances) |
| Privacy | Canny’s servers | Canny’s servers | Full control |
| SSO/OAuth | Growth+ | Business | Built-in |
What You Give Up
Priority scoring by revenue. Canny can weight votes by customer MRR, helping you prioritize features that matter most to paying customers. Fider treats all votes equally.
Built-in changelog. Canny includes a branded changelog page. Fider doesn’t — you’d need a separate changelog tool or a simple blog post.
User segmentation. Canny Business lets you filter feedback by customer attributes (plan, company size, etc.). Fider shows aggregate votes without user segmentation.
Integrations. Canny has native integrations with Jira, Linear, Intercom, Slack, and Zapier. Fider has a REST API and webhooks — you can build integrations, but they’re not pre-built.
For most teams, the core workflow (collect ideas → let users vote → track status → notify on updates) works identically in Fider at 95%+ cost savings.
Related
Get self-hosting tips in your inbox
Get the Docker Compose configs, hardware picks, and setup shortcuts we don't put in articles. Weekly. No spam.
Comments